Nous ne pouvons afficher que des informations limitées pour ce cabinet. Nous affichons des informations plus complètes pour les cabinets suivants :
Morrison Foerster‘s IP litigation team utilizes its global footprint, spanning Asia, Europe and the Americas to counsel clients in a broad range of cases involving literary works, theatre works, visual artwork, sounds recordings and multi media products. The team handle a prolific flow of copyright enforcement and litigation issues fueled by a sophistication in IP owners effort to protect their assets. Adept in a wide range of IP matters practice heads lead from locations across the US: Brian Nash in Austin, Bita Rahebi in Los Angeles, Timothy Chen Saulsbury in San Francisco and Mark Whitaker in Washington DC. Los-Angeles based lawyer Benjamin Fox , leverages his trial experience for high-stakes copyright and trademark litigation cases. While, San Francisco’s Joseph Gratz boasts deep expertise at the intersection of copyright and new technologies, such as generative AI. Gratz has established precents in internet law and often serves as lead counsel in AI copyright cases, such as numerous ongoing cases for OpenAI which may have pivotal consequences for AI copyright law. Allyson Bennett departed in September 2024.
L’éditorial du Legal 500
Clients clés
- Anthropic Inc
- Archer Aviation, Inc.
Points forts
- Acts as lead counsel for OpenAI in multiple ongoing cases, including a class action DMCA suit alleging the removal of copyright management information in collaboration with GitHub to develop Copilot. The case has progressed to the point where only a breach of contract claim remains following the dismissal of other claims.
- Represents Stability AI, creator of the Stable Diffusion 2.0 image-generation generative AI tool, in all of its U.S. litigation. In a case in the Northern District of California, a group of illustrators allege that the operation of Stable Diffusion infringes copyrights in visual works that the model was trained. In a case in the District of Delaware, stock photo provider Getty Images alleges that the operation of Stable Diffusion infringes copyrights in photographs in which Getty owns copyrights.